2004 Caterham 7 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 2004 Caterham 7. (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2004 Caterham 7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 496 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Caterham 7. (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Caterham 7 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2852 mm |