2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1951 Jaguar MK V
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jaguar MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jaguar MK V would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1951 Jaguar MK V. (123 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1951 Jaguar MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 280 kg more than 1951 Jaguar MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1951 Jaguar MK V | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Astro | MK V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2900 mm |
