2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1958 DKW 600
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 DKW 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 DKW 600 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1958 DKW 600. (30 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1958 DKW 600.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 DKW 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 282 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 DKW 600. (57 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 DKW 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1958 DKW 600 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Astro | 600 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 74 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
