2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1969 Seat 1500
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1969 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 795 kg more than 1969 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1969 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Astro | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |
