2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1972 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Astro | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 124 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2480 mm |