2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 1135 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | Astro | 66 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1390 mm |
