2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1979 Citroen CX
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 565 kg more than 1979 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (166 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1979 Citroen CX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Astro | CX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 166 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102.1 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3100 mm |