2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1980 Zastava 132

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 860 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: