2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1993 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Mazda RX-7 (238 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 655 kg more than 1993 Mazda RX-7.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda RX-7. (296 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda RX-7.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Astro 1993 Mazda RX-7
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Astro RX-7
Year Released 2004 1993
Body Type Minivan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4294 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type V dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 190 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 296 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 8 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1955 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2440 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 102 L 75 L