2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia (203 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 365 kg more than 1995 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1995 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Daewoo |
| Model | Astro | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 203 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4960 mm |
