2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1999 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-01. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Astro | 1999 Mazda RX-01 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Astro | RX-01 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2610 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 216 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2350 mm |
