2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Astro | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Astro | Tracker |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 139 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2210 mm |