2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2001 Holden UTE

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden UTE would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 450 kg more than 2001 Holden UTE.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Holden UTE.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Astro 2001 Holden UTE
Make Chevrolet Holden
Model Astro UTE
Year Released 2004 2001
Body Type Minivan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4294 cc 3789 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 187 HP 204 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 8 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1950 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 5060 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1910 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2950 mm