2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Astro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Astro | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Astro | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2380 mm |