2004 Chevrolet Astro vs. 2009 Volvo S40

To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2009 Volvo S40. (166 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo S40.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Astro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Astro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo S40. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo S40.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Astro 2009 Volvo S40
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Astro S40
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4294 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 166 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 339 Nm 170 Nm
Engine Bore Size 102.1 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.2:1 10.3:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 8 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1460 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.8 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 11.8 L/100km