2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1958 Land Rover 109
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Land Rover 109. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Land Rover 109 would be higher. At 2,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Land Rover 109 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1958 Land Rover 109. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1958 Land Rover 109. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Land Rover 109 weights approximately 637 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1958 Land Rover 109 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Land Rover 109 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Land Rover 109 (157 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 1958 Land Rover 109 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1958 Land Rover 109 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
Model | Aveo | 109 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2285 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1063 kg | 1700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2070 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2780 mm |