2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1962 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1962 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 37 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Aveo | Munga |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1073 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 31 L |
