2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 138 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (145 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Aveo | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2540 mm |
