2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 247 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (203 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Aveo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1073 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2680 mm |