2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (100 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 929 weights approximately 97 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Aveo | 929 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1063 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2620 mm |
