2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Plymouth Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle weights approximately 97 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Plymouth Caravelle (159 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 1982 Plymouth Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
| Model | Aveo | Caravelle |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1606 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 159 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1068 kg | 1165 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2630 mm |
