2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Aveo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Aveo weights approximately 200 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Aveo (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Aveo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Aveo | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Aveo | 323 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |