2004 Chevrolet Aveo vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Aveo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (103 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 3 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Aveo.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Aveo 2012 Mazda 3
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Aveo 3
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1606 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 103 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 183 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1068 kg 1300 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2570 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Consumption 6.9 L/100km 7.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 8.9 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 55 L