2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1960 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1960 Jaguar XK. (187 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 165 kg more than 1960 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jaguar XK. (310 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1960 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XK |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 310 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1473 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 90 L |