2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 468 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Blazer | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |