2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 774 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste. (118 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1980 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Blazer | Celeste |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1410 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 118 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2350 mm |