2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 486 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Blazer | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1806 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2680 mm |
