2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 140 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | XJR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 333 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1824 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 21.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 89 L |