2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1995 Lada Niva
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Lada Niva would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1995 Lada Niva. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 1995 Lada Niva.
Because 1995 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Lada Niva. (130 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1995 Lada Niva | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Blazer | Niva |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.4 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2710 mm |