2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Blazer | FTO |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 202 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1300 mm |