2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Citroen C3
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 432 kg more than 2000 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Blazer | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 147 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1252 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 47 L |