2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Subaru Outback. (154 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2000 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 148 kg more than 2000 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Subaru Outback. (223 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Blazer | Outback |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 223 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 64 L |