2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 769 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Blazer | C2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 150 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 41 L |