2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 558 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (141 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | 2 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 141 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 45 L |