2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, both 2004 Chevrolet Blazer and 2004 Lincoln LS were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (280 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 45 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (388 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lincoln |
Model | Blazer | LS |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 280 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1729 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |