2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, both 2004 Chevrolet Blazer and 2004 Mercury Sable were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 125 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Blazer | Sable |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 68 L |