2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2008 Maybach 62
To start off, 2008 Maybach 62 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,978 cc (12 cylinders), 2008 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Maybach 62 (604 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1121 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Maybach 62 (1,000 Nm) has 661 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2008 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2008 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Maybach |
Model | Blazer | 62 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 604 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 1000 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3830 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 16.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 110 L |