2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2009 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. (143 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 182 kg more than 2009 Jaguar X-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar X-Type (361 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2009 Jaguar X-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Jaguar X-Type | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | Blazer | X-Type |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 361 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1502 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 61 L |