2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 569 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Blazer | 21 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 131 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 43 L |