2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz G
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz G is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mercedes-Benz G weights approximately 912 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz G (530 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Mercedes-Benz G | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Blazer | G |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 382 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 530 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 2550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4686 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1824 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 96 L |