2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2011 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2011 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Mustang (305 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 57 kg more than 2011 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Mustang (379 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2011 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Blazer | Mustang |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 379 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1627 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 61 L |