2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 257 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Blazer | Rezzo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 60 L |