2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Blazer | Epica |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |