2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2012 Honda Accord
To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 194 kg more than 2012 Honda Accord.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Accord. (219 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2012 Honda Accord | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Blazer | Accord |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 219 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |