2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Audi A5
To start off, 2013 Audi A5 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Audi A5 (208 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 9 kg more than 2013 Audi A5.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Audi A5 (350 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2013 Audi A5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Blazer | A5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | rear |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 208 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1638 kg | 1629 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4626 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1372 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |