2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (190 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford C-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Ford C-MAX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Blazer | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1754 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1621 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 2.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 2.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 53 L |
