2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Ford F-150
To start off, 2013 Ford F-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford F-150 (355 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford F-150 weights approximately 661 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford F-150 (515 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (339 Nm). This means 2013 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2013 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Blazer | F-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 515 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 2345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5888 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2464 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3683 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 98 L |