2004 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2013 Mazda 6
To start off, 2013 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 6 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. (190 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Blazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Blazer weights approximately 185 kg more than 2013 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Blazer (339 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Blazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Blazer | 2013 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Blazer | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 226 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1684 kg | 1499 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 70 L |