2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 871 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cavalier | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1247 kg | 2118 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 107 L |
