2004 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (140 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 362 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier (203 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | 616 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 124 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |